by VAMtns41 » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:37 pm
I retired from IA in mid-2007 after 30+ years. One of my biggest problems as Manager & Director was the too often complete inability of internal auditors to write accurate, clear, concise, comprehensive, readable, understandable, and factually supported audit reports, which "sold" the conditions found and corrective actions recommended. Too often they did one or more of the following: (1) stopped at the "symptoms" and wrote the findings, never finding the real causes, resulting in no solution to the problems; (2) did not write simple and to the point; often writing multiple pages rambling on when 1/2 page properly done would be sufficient (management does not have the time and inclination to read long audit reports) ; (3) frequently mixing up subjects in the same paragraph or repeating multiple subjects in multiple paragraphs, resulting in confusion the readers; and (4) confusing the reader by not using the correct subject, verb, and action in each sentence; that is, providing the information "backwards"; often switching in sentences in the same paragraphs!
Many of the auditors did competent work and could usually explain audit reports verbally. However, when they started writing, some type of gremlin took over their brains! I think this is primarily caused by universities which do not emphasize, teach, and grade on written and verbal communications!
In my humble opinion!
I appreciate your thoughts, observations, and recommendations.