AuditNet®

CAATT Tales

 

 

Running for Fraud

By Don Sparks, CIA, CISA, ARM

Audimation Services, Inc.

 

Experts in Data Analysis
Volume 1 Issue 7

 

 

I read an article in the newspaper the other day that reminded me of a similar scheme I encountered before and it just shows you that what is considered old can sometimes be viewed as something new.
 

“Marathon of Lies"
 

A 55 year old woman was claiming workers compensation benefits for a lower back injury that made her able to handle only light duty work at her postal job. During the period of her injury of almost 2 years, she competed in over 80 athletic events including 5k races, 10k races, triathlons, and marathons including the Boston Marathon. She stated that she received the injury while helping at an annual letter carriers food drive. An investigator hired by her employer was able to capture her in photos and on film during several events demonstrating that she was able to swim, bicycle and run in very grueling endurance events.
She now faces up to 5 years in prison for false statements and 10 years in prison for health-care fraud.

 

“Running Business?”
A few years ago, I worked at a company that was a co-sponsor of a large city annual marathon. Our HR department was concerned that worker absences increased in the months before the race and continued for a couple of weeks after. HR was aware that internal auditing had auditors that were experienced users of data analysis software and asked internal audit to come up with a way to see if there was a correlation between the race participants and employee absences.
 

This was not all that difficult. As a co-sponsor of the race our company had access to the race registration information. Our analysis revealed numerous employees that were taking the day off for a long training run as well as the next day as a “recovery” day. The most blatant employee missed almost 55% of the time while training for the marathon as he had a recurring back injury that was being treated by a chiropractor. This employee worked at a service center in a neighboring state.

 

The Challenge
 

When looking for fraud, a significant problem is differentiating between legitimate transactions and nearly identical fraudulent ones. By definition a false positive transaction is one that meets the fraud data profile, but is not in and of itself a fraudulent transaction.
The challenge is to decide how to reduce or eliminate false positives without missing the opportunity to capture the false negatives because each loss may be very costly.

 

No one enjoys spending time working on what appears to be exceptions only to find out that a valid reason exists. However, in this situation the auditor’s lack of in depth knowledge worked to the auditor’s advantage. Employees working in HR would routinely ignore questioning the validity of an absence if it was for things like jury duty, death in the family, injured on the job (WC), taking care of an elderly parent or sick child, etc. These are considered to be “innocent absenteeism” or non-culpable matters. .
 

The auditor looked at the sheer magnitude of absences and easily found the worst offenders.

 

Data Analysis

 

As the race was “sold-out” more than 6 months before the race day, we had access to a data file that was almost 100% complete.  The race file data included first name, last name, gender, home address and birth date.

 

HR provided the attendance records that indicated similar data plus of course the days absent including a simple reason for absence.

 

 

Internal audit easily joined the two files together based on last name, first name initial, gender, age and zip code.

 

We then summarized the records by employee number resulting in one record per employee with a count of the total days absent.  Working with HR, we decided to exclude records (employees) with less than one day absent per month. 

 

The resulting file was sorted with the most days off first, which immediately identified the employee at the service cent er in the neighboring state.  The remainder of the file was divided by department and sent to each department head for further analysis.


Take IDEA for a test drive:

If you would like to try this feature out for yourself, request a demo copy of the IDEA data analysis software [CLICK HERE].

 


To respond to this solution or provide data analysis questions you would like answered in future newsletter articles, please send an email to dons@audimation.com 


The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the various authors and forum participants on this web site do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of AuditNet®