This checklist provides guidance on how to
prepare audit work papers to ensure quality and clarity. The checklist
identifies organizational tasks, required information, and formatting that
should be complete prior to submitting audit work papers for review. Using
this type of checklist will facilitate the review process performed by
superiors or management.
|
Review
Areas
|
Comments |
|
Are work papers neat
and not crowded? |
|
|
Is sufficient
information factual, adequate, and convincing so that a prudent,
informed person would reach the same conclusions as the auditor? |
|
|
Are work papers able
to “stand alone”? (This means that an individual independent of the
preparer should be able to determine, for each work paper, the purpose
and conclusion of the document, and how that individual work paper
relates to the rest of the work papers.) |
|
|
Are work papers
concise, and serve a useful purpose? |
|
|
Are work papers
consistent and uniform in terms of size and appearance? |
|
|
Does the work paper
include the following: the title of the process being audited, title of
the work paper, preparer's/reviewers initials, date prepared, source of
information, and purpose of the work paper? |
|
|
For work paper
documents provided by the Process Owner, is the source, and date
provided on the lower left hand section of the document? |
|
|
Are tick marks used
appropriately and consistently throughout the work paper? |
|
|
Is cross‑referencing
within work papers complete and accurate? |
|
|
Are all work papers
numbered in a sequential and logical fashion? |
|
|
Do work papers that
document the results of client meetings or inquiry and observation of
key control activities include meeting date, purpose, attendees/title
and the meeting results/discussion items? |
|
|
Does the lead sheet
for each key control activity tested contain each of the following? |
|
|
1.
A description of the key control activity |
|
|
2.
The test steps performed |
|
|
3.
The sample selected, the population the sample was selected from
and the sampling methodology used |
|
|
4.
The testing procedures performed |
|
|
5.
A summary of the results of test work performed |
|
|
6.
A description of the control gaps or issues identified as a
result of the testing performed |
|
|
7.
A conclusion regarding the operating effectiveness of the key
control activity (i.e., effective or ineffective). |
|
|
|
|